Author is the CEO of an SEO company and their submission history is almost exclusively political posts. Can only assume is bait to get some good incoming link juice. Flagged and moving on.
No politics now, possibly all the time, is naive. Politics shapes the business environment in which you operate. How you raise funds, how and who you hire, who and where are your customers, etc. How you discuss things and the temperature level of said discussions should be somewhat lower. But trying to discuss business in an abstract environment detached from reality is just burning electrons.
Digging through previous comments to personally attack another user is a flagrant violation of the rules here and borderline psychopathic. Go back to Reddit.
Pointing out a user’s hypocrisy from their contribution history violates which rule? Please be specific. You cannot say “No politics please.” when it’s clear the argument being put forth is “but only politics I don’t like.”
They posted their blog post. That was a choice, and theirs to defend against evidence presented.
From the blog that brought us:
Tips for How Not to Be Killed by a Police Officer (3 points, 16d ago) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46550052
Bankruptcy Mechanism for Government 60d ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46053682
Assassinated – why did United Healthcare Group's CEO die? 2024 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42349730
Bipartisanship Needed to Fight the Return of Global Slavery 2022 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33247255
Von Clausewitz on Why America Can’t Win Wars 2022 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33164806
(continues..)
“It’s ok when I do it.”
Author is the CEO of an SEO company and their submission history is almost exclusively political posts. Can only assume is bait to get some good incoming link juice. Flagged and moving on.
No politics now, possibly all the time, is naive. Politics shapes the business environment in which you operate. How you raise funds, how and who you hire, who and where are your customers, etc. How you discuss things and the temperature level of said discussions should be somewhat lower. But trying to discuss business in an abstract environment detached from reality is just burning electrons.
After reading this, I worry what else you’ve been repeating inside your head.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46555451
I bet you would cry foul after being BTFO in every political thread you touch:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46542011
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46541999
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46541992
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46550166
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46747587
Digging through previous comments to personally attack another user is a flagrant violation of the rules here and borderline psychopathic. Go back to Reddit.
Pointing out a user’s hypocrisy from their contribution history violates which rule? Please be specific. You cannot say “No politics please.” when it’s clear the argument being put forth is “but only politics I don’t like.”
They posted their blog post. That was a choice, and theirs to defend against evidence presented.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html